There were twenty participants involved in carrying out this research, the participants included nurses working within ICU. These are focus of the study, background, the aim of the study, methodology or approach used, data collection tools, sampling technique, ethical . (2012). /Resources 16 0 R (2015) Technological innovations in mental healthcare: harnessing the digital Participants expressed a willingness to undergo any procedure of treatment no /MediaBox [0 0 595 842] tissue. dependency which undermined family roles. << Polit and Beck (2018) state the number of participants in quantitative research is a major concern. /CropBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] This essay assesses a peer reviewed paper written by McCaughan et al (2018) and published in the International Journal of Nursing Studies. research evidence is to subject it to critical appraisal using tools and frameworks like /CropBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] Copyright 2003 - 2023 - UKEssays is a trading name of Business Bliss Consultants FZE, a company registered in United Arab Emirates. The findings of the research were classified into seven themes: wound related According toLoBiondo-Wood and Haber (2014)surveys have their advantages and disadvantages. /Type /Catalog confuse patients, who do not understand why their wound should not be sewn, perceptions and experiences of living with a surgical wound healing by secondary /CropBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] This survey was modified for the current study to include only questions addressing pain assessment in non-verbal patients as well as the demographic portion of the survey. Gordon, DB., Dahl, JL., Miaskowski, C., McCarberg, B., Todd, KH., Paice, JA., Lipman, AG., Bookbinder, M., Sanders, SH. Participants expressed a willingness to undergo any procedure of treatment no matter how unpleasant, if it promoted healing (p.32). Polit and Beck (2018) state purposeful sampling can lead to bias, but it can also be a useful approach when the researcher wants a sample of experts. surgical site complications of closed surgical incisions: a possible role of Incisional Royal College of Nursing (2009). Critiquing frameworks There are several frameworks for critiquing research, some of which have been constructed to critique or evaluate both qualitative and quantitative studies. However, Holloway and Wheeler (2010) state maximum variation is not usually used in qualitative research. >> Why do you need a critiquing framework for research? It's still available to buy, so you can replicate this royal look via the link. Subject selection was carried out with maximum variation in personal factors including, age, education level, duration of work experience and organisational role. /OpenAction [3 0 R /XYZ null null 0] Within article B maintaining the anonymity of the data was considered crucial to encourage participants to answer the questions according to clinical practice. Both articles have a clear-cut aim to look at in which pain is assessed for those patients who are unable to communicate in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. What are the different types of critiquing frameworks? Rose, L., Smith, O., Glinas, C., Haslam, L., Dale, C., Luk, E. and Watt-Watson, J. There is no mention within this study of inclusion or exclusion criteria. research evidence (Ellis, 2019). In another study, Scalise et al (2016) in a different study reported patients A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and analysis which was done using an inductive approach. conflicting reports about wound progress and, for instance, debridement needs, and An advantage to this type of interview is it will allow probing of answers, also it will allow the participant to give a detailed account of experiences and feelings (Ellis, 2013). >> >> Caution should be exercised when choosing a suitable framework, as each framework asks slightly different questions of the research. << Both papers have used the best research they could find when explaining why efficient pain assessment and management is important within the ICU setting. The findings are presented as codes, subcategories, and categories using an inductive approach. If your specific country is not listed, please select the UK version of the site, as this is best suited to international visitors. This essay should not be treated as an authoritative source of information when forming medical opinions as information may be inaccurate or out-of-date. they would have preferred healing by primary intention, even if that would have not Article B showed limitations, one of the questions within the survey assessed the pain assessment tools used by the participant. stitched. (2012), in which there were three common barriers to pain assessment and management in general. This framework was used because of its rigour and systematic approach to Most of the analysis consisted of computing the frequency of certain attitudes, beliefs, or pain assessment practices. (2012). endobj /MediaBox [0 0 595 842] There were also reports of lack of continuity in care because of district nurse variations who sometimes gave conflicting reports about wound progress and, for instance, debridement needs, and unexpected changes to dressing and management regimens. The advantage of a survey is a lot of information can be gathered from a large population in an economical manner, also survey research can be surprisingly accurate. << Holland and Rees' critique tools. Younger patient families with young children reported as extremely painful (p), resulted in patient frustration. Publicato il . 6 0 obj However, there is a crisis of funding in the NHS, so the issue of district nurse time looks to be a serious barrier for the long term, unless staffing improves. 24 (2), pp. Based on the findings found from both articles nurses heavy workload forced nurses to disregard some clinical practices and prevented them from the frequent use of pain assessment tools. 105-112 [Accessed 29 April 2019]. These barriers are nursing workload 50% stated this and patient instability 80% of nurses stated this. [Online]. 7. The accounts contrast the biologically productive area people use for their consumption to the biologically productive area available . A Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to examine the correlation between years of experience of the participant and use of pain assessment tools, as well as between years of experience and perceived importance of the use of assessment tools in the pain assessment of nonverbal patients. This shows easier, quicker pain assessment tools and further training is required for carrying out these assessments. The researcher includes some of these comments and statements within the study, this is the researcher trying to provide evidence of credibility according to Holland and Rees (2010). In spite of all these, this research will still be applying Holland and Rees critiquing framework to evaluate the research papers . been in their best interests. the Hek and Moule framework (Watt, 2018) or rigorous methods and multiple, literature International wound journal, 13 (6), pp-1281. NURS2001 Research Critique. Casey D, Clark L and Hayes S (2017) Study skills for master's level students: a reflective approach for health and social care. The participants do however, state there are barriers which can prevent them from carrying out the assessments. Partners had to work longer hours to maintain the income of the household. These are focus of the study, background, the aim of the study, methodology or approach used, data collection tools, sampling technique, ethical considerations, findings, conclusion and recommendations, overall strengths and limitations, and the relevance of the study to practice. What is the aim of an independent critique? (2012). Holland & Rees (2010) argued that focus is a major criterion in judging whether the quantitative method applied is appropriate in the context of the research issue concerned, which is again dependent on identifiable measurable variables and the importance of the topic being studied. In a identified as part of this study was a are at risk of implementing research context of increasing involvement of the personal account of a widely published findings that are of poor value and/ expert patient in healthcare and research, service-user expert-by-experience, Louise or quality (Rees, 2010b). A systematic review of the The findings are presented as codes, subcategories, and categories using an inductive approach. confirmatory strategies (Polit and Beck, 2010:10). This can help readers understand the direction of your critique. Most of the patients expressed fear and anxiety when they saw the wound. >> A disadvantage of carrying out a survey is the breadth rather than the depth of the information is emphasized. /Parent 2 0 R benefits of using holland and rees critiquing frameworkstitch regulator for janome 8900 / All participants were nurses with experience in the ICU setting, nurses experience ranged from less than two to greater than ten years. This article is a resource for understanding the difference between critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines, and identifying and accessin /CS /DeviceRGB << There is a need to understand the terms "validity" and An overview of the evidence-based practice process for novice researchers. According toLoBiondo-Wood and Haber (2014)surveys have their advantages and disadvantages. /Parent 2 0 R There were severe consequences for some patients and their families where This article, the second in a three-part series on research, explores quantitative research. Due to the most common barrier being nursing workload, unit policy should support the use of assessment tools that are not only supported by research but are also quick and easy to use. Almost all patients had district nurse visits and they expressed frustration that the Statement of the aim in both papers clearly outlines why the research is being carried out and states what will be done with the findings. &quot;The qualities of an effective mentor&quot; (Gray and Smith, 2000) was critiqued using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP, 2006) framework. What are the critiquing frameworks for qualitative research trying to do? Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare. Holland & Rees: Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Skills Frameworks for critiquing research articles. a. use a textbook to get an overview of your subject b. use a medical dictionary or encyclopaedia for a definition of your key concept c. check references you already have - what terms have they used to describe your topic? Relations between principal and third party, Sample/practice exam 2011, questions and answers - MCQ with answers, Multiple Choice Questions Chapter 3 Demand and Supply, Q2 Identify three factors that can negatively impact on an individuals wellbeing, Acoples-storz - info de acoples storz usados en la industria agropecuaria. . The purpose of a research critique is to determine whether the findings are usable for you (Brink & Wood, 2001, p. 57). TheNursing and Midwifery Council (2018)state nurses should alwayspracticein line with the best available evidence, they must make sure advice or information given is evidence-based and maintain the skills and knowledge which is needed for safe and effective practice. Use this with a research article so you . Show abstract. >> and Beck (2010), LoBiondo-Wood and Haber (2010), Holland and Rees (2010) and Gerrish and Lacey (2010), to name a few. Care (pp. This assignment will critically evaluate two articles that are found in the data extraction table. There are a few enablers and barriers to putting these interventions in place. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. provide them with quick solutions. framework [11], this study will aim to answer this research questionin the treatment of adults requesting facial aes- unexpected changes to dressing and management regimens. Part 1: quantitative research. /MediaBox [0 0 595 842] revolution The British Journal of Psychiatry, 206 (4), pp-265. From using the Holland and Rees (2010) critiquing framework weaknesses for article A there was no mention within their article of limitations, the study was conducted well and answered the research question. This was reported to be at odds with clinicians expectations as they understood that open wounds take slightly longer to heal. [Accessed 27 April 2019]. How to use Checklist. /Resources 32 0 R /Resources 16 0 R The participants in this study were 26 intensive care nurses from a hospital in Central Virginia. One difference in findings is that nurses within article A felt the need for pain assessment tools in ICU patients was not necessary, whereas article Bs participants stated their use to be important. Ethical considerations within research set out core principles to protect the dignity, safety and rights of the individuals who are taking part, the study should have potential benefit to the individuals themselves or future patients and be of non-maleficence (Holland and Rees, 2010). to use a framework which is appropriate. 5 What is the hierarchy of evidence in research? Michael Coughlan. But where visits were x\I9.( I l@ bm$x:/o9?N`/7gx{\,Oz=Y{of}H/gw3=x1f[y_YW7.s|#Xsw>]}t>6jyO /&w}|{;\+;11XTo$$H\6g}L[.qYry9YAK_#.o&FXo+g@~gLydqS {,!^i+Zm>}c\(n|`s"j9Q$W;Dy]JcR uy5tf%&@p.'DY(%~)wote_uc*t=Ygfb$r0zr{T4d>#q?_R|B/QA2%#5cl+.GNEK\i|:+s7-~X0Z`2,l1@l_x-Ozhf'>h xv4;j| `9S@NPn]=[bYYTa(qa+A.Usj:Q$lDsr PTu ?C(}K6gJ QFW`\8R`h Fsg\\}Vb pcu) W*EV#yu26D-9wOE^C:)Q4`TX1MsS9d>;(,u$TQ%r+u &k( &$ uR+(Usc6&Nx;y[Z+_E38${ zg (?9*L5 1v6%-vot%P"muj. This article is a resource for understanding . It is important the barriers found within article B are evaluated to promote further compliance with the use of pain assessment tools. The advantage of using a framework is that a systematic and thorough evaluation is enabled. /Kids [5 0 R 6 0 R 7 0 R 8 0 R 9 0 R 10 0 R 11 0 R 12 0 R 13 0 R 14 0 R Ethical Context of Nursing Research. The critical appraisal tool used for assessment of the paper is the Holland and Rees framework for critiquing qualitative research articles. [Accessed 29 April 2019]. . /Author Critiquing Framework For Literature Review It should illustrate how the current study fits into the existing framework of. depression in people who had undergone open wound surgery. Both articles agree with the barriers which prevent nurses carrying out pain assessment efficiently in nonverbal patients, they both have similar findings. This critique of McCaughan et als (2018) paper using Hek and Moules framework has highlighted some pertinent issues relating to EBP. >> (2018) Patients perceptions and experiences of living with a surgical wound healing by secondary intention: A qualitative study International journal of nursing studies, 77, pp.29-38. Polit and Beck (2018) state Spearmans correlation is used for correlations between variables measured on an ordinal scale. From using the Holland and Rees (2010) critiquing framework weaknesses for article A there was no mention within their article of limitations, the study was conducted well and answered the research question. /Parent 17 0 R /Rotate 0 /Rotate 0 Due to these patients not being able to self-report, their pain cannot be properly assessed and treated. There are several frameworks for critiquing research, some of which have been constructed to critique or evaluate both qualitative and quantitative studies. since 2003, Your NursingAnswers.net purchase is secure and we're rated Article A used a purposeful sampling method to select participants, this continued until data saturation. Linking Evidence to Action. However, because these tools can ask an extensive number of questions to cover all types of study design, students can be put off, as the questions do not always seem relevant to the paper they wish to critique. EBP is important in the improvement of health care quality, especially in this very important area of open wound management, in the cost-constrained environment that health and social care is placed. /Rotate 0 benefits of using holland and rees critiquing framework. American pain society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management. /Type /Page /Contents [19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R] Article As study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Both articles are relevant to practice due to the articles aiming to improve pain management and assessment in nonverbal patients. Article critiquing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written . /Producer <6954657874AE20352E352E3420A9323030302D323031342069546578742047726F7570204E5620284147504C2D76657273696F6E29> Norman et al (2016) who reported feelings of guilt, emotional volatility and Nurse Education Today. >> Overall, critiquing a qualitative research article requires a . Polit and Beck (2010) say rigorous studies that can contribute to evidence-based practice (EBP) should be based on a systematic inquiry that helps develop evidence on problems and challenges that are important to healthcare professionals. /F2 25 0 R /Parent 2 0 R The advantage of a survey is a lot of information can be gathered from a large population in an economical manner, also survey research can be surprisingly accurate. The primary data source in phenomenological studies is in-depth conversations. 63-74) CRC Press. /Rotate 0 Different frameworks can be used to critique research articles, the framework which will be used within this assignment is the Holland and Rees (2010) critiquing research framework. Like an essay, a critique uses a formal, academic writing style and has a clear structure, that is, an introduction, body and conclusion. The modified survey was evaluated for content validity by four faculty members at Liberty University with a background in critical care, these individuals had a lot of experience with working within the ICU. [Online]. Available at: Holland, K and Rees, C. (2010). Both articles are ethically vigorous due to article B being submitted to the IRB and the researcher undergoing formal IRB training. All results are clearly presented within the articles results section, results are presented using tables. Reconstructing the Constructivist Roman Law Thesis' (2010) 54 International . In-text: (Holland and Rees, 2010) Your Bibliography: Holland, K. and Rees, C., 2010. Article B states participants in their study read the cover page of the survey, this provided necessary information for informed consent. This article criticizes President Aquino's fourth State of the Nation (SONA). Kratzke, C. and Cox, C. (2012) Smartphone technology and apps: rapidly changing health promotion Global Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 15(1). (2018) Evidence-based practice In Clinical Governance in Primary Care (pp. Levels of evidence (sometimes called hierarchy of evidence) are assigned to studies based on the methodological quality of their design, validity, and applicability to patient care. Critical Analysis of Evidence research papers; qualitative and quantitative, using a framework set out by Holland and Rees (2010), and will explore the impact on practice. this introduction. This shows easier, quicker pain assessment tools and further training is required for carrying out these assessments. Unless government can increase funding, the provision of holistic and person-centred care will be difficult. 8 Are there frameworks for critiquing quantitative studies? Holland & Rees: Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Skills. Three articles were identified: two qualitative studies based on interviews with imprisoned mothers, and one quantitative study into re-offending . This survey was modified for the current study to include only questions addressing pain assessment in non-verbal patients as well as the demographic portion of the survey. >> Most of the patients interviewed expressed desperation and frustration and wanted [Online]. /MediaBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] The Holland and Rees framework 2010 describe the sample as a very important stage of the research, this stage can be critically analysed. 13 0 obj 18 July, 2006 By NT Contributor. Patricia Cronin. This study was conducted using content analysis method in line with Graneheim and Lundman (2004). << The There were also reports /Resources 32 0 R We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. May patients reported that many district nurses lacked appropriate knowledge, expertise and experience, often requiring patient guidance. /Annots [29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R] endobj The experience of the participants as nurses and as nurses in an intensive care unit ranged from less than two to greater than ten years. This new feature enables different reading modes for our document viewer. /Contents 38 0 R changes and reduced wound infection. Practicing registered nurses and advance practice nurses must be able to critically appraise and disseminate evidence in order to meet EBP competencies. endobj The PICO process (or framework) is a mnemonic used in evidence-based practice (and specifically evidence-based medicine) to frame and answer a clinical or health care related question. cavities. /Type /Page Different frameworks can be used to critique research articles, the framework which will be used within this assignment is theHolland and Rees (2010) critiquing research framework. Conclusions . /F3 26 0 R tools, sampling technique, ethical considerations, findings, conclusion and One quantitative and one qualitative using the holland and ree's critiquing framework. 2018. /Group 43 0 R The unfamiliarity with names of tools may affect the accuracy of the results obtained from this question. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on the NursingAnswers.net website then please: Our academic writing and marking services can help you!